The Comic Book Superhero Message Board
  Dark Knight Fights Piracy  Site Home  

Boards
Comic Book News

Comic Conventions
Clips and Trailers

Gallery
Features
Link to us

Online Comic Books
Resources
Store
Superhero Wiki
Wallpaper
»User: »Password:   Remember Me? 
Comic Book Super Heroes Forum / Super Heroes / DC Comics / Batman / Dark Knight Fights Piracy
Posted:  30 Jul 2008 18:27
The LA Times reports that Warner Bros had to take special tactics to keep the Dark Knight from off of pirated DVD shelves and off the internet.

Quote:


Warner created a "chain of custody" to track who had access to the film at any moment. It varied the shipping and delivery methods, staggering the delivery of film reels, so the entire movie wouldn't arrive at multiplexes in one shipment, in order to reduce risk of an entire copy being lost or stolen. It conducted spot checks of hundreds of theaters domestically and abroad, to ensure that illegal camcording wasn't taking place. It even handed out night-vision goggles to exhibitors in Australia, where the film opened two days before its U.S. launch, to scan the audience for the telltale infrared signal of a camcorder.
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-darkknight28-2008jul28,0,22 ...


Quote:
Warner Bros. executives said the extra vigilance paid off, helping to prevent camcorded copies of the reported $180-million film from reaching Internet file-sharing sites for about 38 hours. Although that doesn't sound like much progress, it was enough time to keep bootleg DVDs off the streets as the film racked up a record-breaking $158.4 million on opening weekend. The movie has now taken in more than $300 million.

The success of an anti-piracy campaign is measured in the number of hours it buys before the digital dam breaks.


See Dark Knight posters and the Batman Store
Posted:  03 Aug 2008 03:34
yeah, Warner bros are one of the stingiest companies on earth.

I was shut me down on deviant art last week, and I found out it was due to a warner bros represenative who complained about my ledger images violating their copyright. A legal way of saying "we aint making no money off of it!" Well neither do I, I never charge for my images. Of course deviant art refused to give me the sob's name, knowing his life would be at risk for his inteference.

They should know by now, if they dont want fans making their own images, then dont put it up on the net
Posted:  04 Aug 2008 14:32   Last Edited By: Tim
That doesn't make much sense. Warner bros promotes their shows and stuff through fan websites so why get upset over a fan art page? They actually encourage websites that might promote their latest dvds and such. Maybe deviant was conned.
Posted:  05 Aug 2008 09:13
Since when does it have to make sense? They tried a similar thing with a friend of mine not long ago. But he lives in the UK and he told them to bugger off. They have no jurisdiction and no way to make him take his pics down.
Posted:  05 Aug 2008 14:16
I think I may know why. Doesn't figure completely still, but from looking at deviantart.com it looks like they charge money for people to see the images. So warner bros could get upset over somebody making money which wouldn't have anything to do with you personally as you aren't the one making the money.

I did a search for Batman and they have all kinds of Batman images though.
Posted:  05 Aug 2008 16:41
No not always. Only if you sign for a subscription, is there a fee. Most dont bother unless they really want no ads on their page.
 
Batman DVDs


Buy Narnia on DVD

Superhero Collectibles
Batman Captain America
Daredevil Fantastic Four
Hulk Iron Man Indiana Jones
Justice League Spider-man
Star Trek Star Wars
Superman TMNT
Transformers
Wonder Woman X-men